PTW · JSA · Life-Saving Rules · ISO 45001

Critical controls

Premium construction safety operations for board-level visibility: site risk, field evidence, corrective actions, and audit readiness.

Controls
7
Review register
Ready
2
Implemented paths
Watch
3
Demo-ready / needs proof
Client input
2
PTW, competency, cameras
High risk
3
Residual high/critical
Safety-head walkthrough

CCTV PPE is one control; this is the HSE operating layer around it.

The register maps SiteGuard evidence to permit-to-work, JSA/JHA, Life-Saving Rules, Focus Four, contractor competency, emergency escalation, privacy, and detector integrity. It deliberately marks customer-dependent controls instead of pretending the camera module solves them.

Next action

Collect customer inputs for PTW/JSA, contractor competency, escalation, and camera/VMS details.

Permit / JSA

1 critical control

Evidence-linked readiness

Permit-to-work and JSA linkage

Can every high-risk task prove valid work authorization, JSA controls, receiver/approver, zone, time window, and close-out evidence?

watchhigh risk
Actions
0
Evidence
1
Live events
0
Sites
1
SiteGuard coverage

Detection alerts and corrective actions carry site, zone, owner, due date, evidence, and audit trail. Dedicated permit/JSA source integration is the next enterprise input.

Reviewer proof
  • • Permit/JSA reference
  • • approved controls
  • • task owner
  • • zone
  • • closure evidence
Owner
Permit receiver + HSE manager
Permit / JSA
Required before high-risk work starts
Rule
Work authorization
Verification
Observation/action record linked to evidence and audit event
Close-out: Supervisor verifies control restored before work continues
Readiness: Capture customer permit/JSA taxonomy and approval roles.
Life-Saving Rules

3 critical controls

Evidence-linked readiness

Work at height / edge protection

Are fall-prevention controls visible, assigned, verified, and closed before exposure continues?

readymedium risk
Actions
1
Evidence
1
Live events
0
Sites
1
SiteGuard coverage

Seeded dashboard/evidence already includes a high-severity edge-protection action; CCTV can support PPE context but does not claim fall-risk detection yet.

Reviewer proof
  • • barricade inspection
  • • photo/video evidence
  • • assignee
  • • due date
  • • verification note
Owner
Site safety officer
Permit / JSA
JSA fall-prevention control
Rule
Work at height
Verification
Manual evidence + observation close-out
Close-out: Photo proof and HSE approval before reopening area
Readiness: Implemented with current workspace evidence and audit path.

PPE compliance at controlled access zones

Can the system confirm missing hard hat / vest / harness violations with model status, privacy controls, human triage, and corrective action?

watchmedium risk
Actions
0
Evidence
0
Live events
0
Sites
1
SiteGuard coverage

Live monitoring and uploaded-video analysis persist confirmed PPE events, blurred evidence, alert status, and false-positive/resolution actions.

Reviewer proof
  • • camera
  • • zone
  • • required PPE
  • • K-of-N confirmation
  • • blurred snapshot
  • • triage outcome
Owner
HSE control-room operator
Permit / JSA
Site entry and zone-specific PPE controls
Rule
Bypassing safety controls
Verification
Live Monitoring → Alerts → Evidence → Audit trail
Close-out: Assign, resolve, or mark false positive with reason
Readiness: Detector flow is implemented; run a real/model-backed sample or uploaded video to attach event evidence.

Lifting and line-of-fire controls

Are lifting zones, exclusion areas, spotters, and line-of-fire findings visible as critical controls rather than generic observations?

needs inputhigh risk
Actions
0
Evidence
0
Live events
0
Sites
1
SiteGuard coverage

Modeled as a critical-control row with observation/evidence linkage; no fake lifting detection is claimed.

Reviewer proof
  • • lift plan reference
  • • exclusion-zone evidence
  • • spotter/owner
  • • corrective action
Owner
Lifting supervisor
Permit / JSA
Lift plan + JSA
Rule
Safe mechanical lifting / line of fire
Verification
Manual evidence and action record until specialized detector exists
Close-out: Lift supervisor validates exclusion zone restored
Readiness: Capture lifting permit fields and customer camera coverage.
Contractor HSE

1 critical control

Evidence-linked readiness

Contractor competency and authorization

Can each contractor prove orientation, trade competency, HSE staffing, and role authorization for critical work?

needs inputhigh risk
Actions
0
Evidence
0
Live events
0
Sites
1
SiteGuard coverage

Exposed as required enterprise input; not hidden inside CCTV. Current actions can assign owners but do not manage competency records yet.

Reviewer proof
  • • contractor
  • • role
  • • training status
  • • authorization
  • • expiry
Owner
Contractor HSE lead
Permit / JSA
Competency gate before permit approval
Rule
Work authorization
Verification
Future competency register + audit history
Close-out: Expired/missing competencies block permit approval
Readiness: Define contractor master data and training matrix fields.
Emergency response

1 critical control

Evidence-linked readiness

Stop-work and emergency escalation

Do critical findings have a named escalation route, stop-work authority, drill/readiness evidence, and effectiveness review?

watchmedium risk
Actions
0
Evidence
0
Live events
0
Sites
1
SiteGuard coverage

Alert lifecycle is implemented; real email/manager routing stays gated until SMTP and recipients are configured.

Reviewer proof
  • • escalation contact
  • • stop-work decision
  • • timestamp
  • • closure verification
  • • effectiveness note
Owner
Emergency coordinator + project director
Permit / JSA
Emergency response plan
Rule
Stop work authority
Verification
Alert status + audit event + corrective action closure
Close-out: Record response time and post-event effectiveness review
Readiness: Configure customer escalation contacts and drill evidence.
AI governance

1 critical control

Evidence-linked readiness

Privacy-safe AI evidence and chain of custody

Can SiteGuard prove raw CCTV is not leaked, evidence is blurred/minimized, model status is honest, and audit metadata is tamper-evident enough for review?

readylow risk
Actions
0
Evidence
0
Live events
0
Sites
1
SiteGuard coverage

Local YOLO hot path, modelLoaded=false honesty, blurred evidence, SHA-256 image hash, no raw video persistence by default, and audit records.

Reviewer proof
  • • blurred snapshot
  • • model status
  • • hash
  • • audit event
  • • retention policy
Owner
HSE systems owner + data/privacy lead
Permit / JSA
Data governance control
Rule
Bypassing safety controls
Verification
Evidence hash + audit trail + detector health
Close-out: Retention and residency policy approved before production
Readiness: Implemented with current workspace evidence and audit path.